Jessica Mink

As an astronomical software developer at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, I have worked on data pipelines for instruments which produce spectra and scan the sky. At MIT, Cornell, and MIT again, worked on spectra of solar system objects, positions of stars and planets and modelled planetary rings and multiple stars from occultation data, all of which I wrote pipelines to reduce. Over the past I also have worked on inclusion, diversity, and equity issues in astronomy, locally, nationally, and internationally.


Sessions

11-06
08:30
0min
Writing Software Which Will Continue to Work
Jessica Mink

After having some experience keeping two widely-used data access and analysis software packages in use for several decades each, I have found several ways to make packages portable, user-installable, and easily-repairable. These are not the only way to do this, but with software involving special knowledge of particular astronomical data types, more detailed expertise is required than most astronomers and astrophysicists are likely to have. In the case of files of images, spectra, and object catalogs, there are lots of formatting, mapping, and translation problems which can be solved with reliable software that relatively few people can write. RVSAO in IRAF SPP and WCSTools in C have been doing more and more of that since 1989 and 1994 respectively. It has come time to translate the RVSAO spectral redshift package out of IRAF, so the programming and user interface questions needed for that translation to RVTools will be discussed.

Other creative topics in astronomical software
Posters
11-06
17:40
80min
The Future of FITS and Other Standardized Astronomical Data Formats.
Rob Seaman, Jessica Mink

The FITS data standard has served astronomers well for four decades.
The original integer image format has been revised to support additional
pixel data types, to support world coordinates and other scientific
metadata, to include an integrated data compression framework, and to
support generalized binary tables, among other features.

Over the years, a variety of alternative scientific data standards have been
proposed. These usually reach only a limited audience specific to a particular
project or community. No other format has ever garnered the widespread
support of FITS.

We'll hear from several groups who are generating data and how they have
been using FITS standards and extending or creating standards for newer
projects. Are people talking across projects about new standards, even partial
ones? Have people published details of their standard formats? Where?

User Experience for astronomical software
BoFs