Program description:
Introduction
We previously presented a paper on new processes and documents implemented for our library’s systematic review service at the annual CHLA conference in 2023. A task force of health sciences librarians had aimed to formalize our systematic review service to make it more standard, transparent, and to cut down on zombie (uncompleted) reviews. Now that we are two years into using the new procedures and forms, we have decided to assess the model.

Methods/Description/Discussion
We will share feedback on use of the new intake form, MOU document, and protocol template that were developed and we’ll discuss the edits to the forms and procedures we are considering based on this feedback. We will also review our positive and negative experiences using a project management software program to store and share data from our knowledge synthesis projects.