Kari Lancaster

Kari Lancaster is Professor in Social Studies of Science and Health, in the Department of Social and Policy Sciences, at the University of Bath. Her research is informed by Science and Technology Studies (STS), public health sociology, and policy studies, with a focus on the critical social study of science and evidence-making practices in relation to health. Professor Lancaster is recognised for contributing theory-informed, as well as theory-innovating, empirical social science research in her specific fields of focus (health, drugs and addiction, and infectious disease including hepatitis C, HIV, and Covid-19). Her current work explores the relations between science, policy, evidence and intervention amidst transformative global changes affecting health, with a focus on outbreak and viral elimination. Professor Lancaster is Editor of Science, Technology & Human Values.


Session

06-11
16:30
20min
Cleaner evidence? Wastewater-based epidemiology, drugs and harm in times of global change
Kari Lancaster

In 2001, environmental chemists at the US Office of Research and Development in the Environmental Protection Agency proposed the use of a “nonintrusive tool to heighten public awareness of societal use of illicit-abused drugs and their potential for ecological consequences.” Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) has since become an important adjunct to established drug monitoring tools, promising cleaner and more accurate evidence. This paper focuses on the ontopolitical dimensions of WBE and its evidencing in times of global change. Using critical genealogical methods and documentary analysis, I trace the accretion of WBE as a technology of global drug surveillance, attending to how WBE has come to configure the problem of drugs as not only a problem of human health or clandestine markets, but as an ecological concern. Tracing developments through the World Drug Report and transnational surveillance systems, the genealogy examines how WBE translates from environmental science to drug policy, and back again, and how drugs and harm are problematised in these moves. The analysis identifies how WBE works to multiply complexities, relocating harm and demanding renewed attention to the biotic dimensions of drugs as they entangle in different environments. This has implications for how we measure and account for harm in drug policy, shifting attention to how drugs, human bodies, animal bodies, and their environments, as well as regimes of drug surveillance, come together. The case of WBE illuminates the challenges of evidencing drugs, and the need for approaches that focus on ecological, sociological and political configurations of drugs and harm.

Geopolitics of Drug Policy
BS 3.15 - 60 cap.