BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//pretalx//pretalx.com//sips2025-budapest//speaker//7EPVUV
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:CET
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20001029T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
TZNAME:CET
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20000326T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:CEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-sips2025-budapest-LXZR3J@pretalx.com
DTSTART;TZID=CET:20250627T140700
DTEND;TZID=CET:20250627T141400
DESCRIPTION:Scientific conclusions often rely on generic statements (e.g.\,
  “X improves Y”)\, which may imply unwarranted generalisability. Prior
  research suggests that generic claims are perceived as more important tha
 n qualified statements (e.g.\, “X improves some of Y”)\, raising conce
 rns about scientific communication. However\, it remains unclear whether w
 ording affects reproducibility—the extent to which different researchers
  reviewing the same data reach the same conclusion. To investigate this\, 
 I propose a vignette study where researchers evaluate study results and co
 nclusions framed either generically or with a qualifier. If non-universal 
 wording increases agreement\, this suggests that qualifying claims improve
 s robustness. This study builds on Multi100\, a many-analyst project showi
 ng low analytical robustness in the social sciences. By exploring how lang
 uage influences reproducibility\, this research aims to improve best pract
 ices in scientific reporting and enhance the clarity and reliability of pu
 blished findings.
DTSTAMP:20260514T164254Z
LOCATION:Second floor 203
SUMMARY:LT42: Steps to Improve the Reproducibility of Conclusions in the So
 cial Sciences - Harry Clelland
URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2025-budapest/talk/LXZR3J/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR