BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//pretalx//pretalx.com//sips2025-budapest//speaker//F3GHHT
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:CET
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20001029T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
TZNAME:CET
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20000326T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:CEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-sips2025-budapest-FJ7QKW@pretalx.com
DTSTART;TZID=CET:20250625T150000
DTEND;TZID=CET:20250625T150700
DESCRIPTION:There exist strong theoretical and methodological ties between 
 the disciplines of psychology and management. Yet almost none of the "top"
  journals in the field of management/ organizational behavior accept regis
 tered reports\, despite many espousing a commitment to open science and re
 forms aligned with the credibility revolution. In this lightning talk I wi
 ll provide information on the uptake of registered reports in the field of
  management\, detail ongoing advocacy efforts for greater adoption (and in
 vite others in attendance to join)\, and discuss personal experiences rela
 ted to misperceptions of and objections to registered reports in the field
  of management/organizational behavior.
DTSTAMP:20260511T114601Z
LOCATION:Second floor 214
SUMMARY:LT16: Let’s Convince Management and Organizational Behavior Journ
 als to Accept Registered Reports - Jeffrey Lees
URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2025-budapest/talk/FJ7QKW/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-sips2025-budapest-BGXCY7@pretalx.com
DTSTART;TZID=CET:20250626T133000
DTEND;TZID=CET:20250626T150000
DESCRIPTION:It is increasingly common for editors to ask for high-powered\,
  direct replications of studies when papers are invited for revision. Howe
 ver\, norms regarding what to do when these replications fail do not exist
 \, either for authors attempting to reframe their findings\, or reviewers/
 editors reevaluating the work. A lack of clear expectations and norms risk
 s not only confusion and consternation\, but possibly reinforcing perverse
  publication incentives where only “statistically significant” results
  are valued rather than strong and valid tests of theoretical questions. T
 his Unconference will begin with the organizer and participants discussing
  their experiences with failed replications during peer review. The group 
 will then discuss the “ideal” way these are handled\, from the perspec
 tive of both authors and reviewers/editors. Given interest\, the group wil
 l then potentially organize to produce a short methodological manuscript t
 hat addresses these questions and provides guidance for editors and author
 s confronting these issues.
DTSTAMP:20260511T114601Z
LOCATION:Second floor 213
SUMMARY:UC9: Failed Replications During Peer-Review: What Should Happen The
 n? - Jeffrey Lees
URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2025-budapest/talk/BGXCY7/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-sips2025-budapest-BQYAPH@pretalx.com
DTSTART;TZID=CET:20250627T160000
DTEND;TZID=CET:20250627T170000
DESCRIPTION:Keynotes: Alexandra Sarafoglou\, Marton Kovacs\, Jeffrey Lees\,
  Lisa Spitzer\, and Agata Bochynska.\nModerator: Ekaterina Pronizius\n\nTh
 is year\, we are departing from tradition at SIPS. Rather than inviting in
 dividual keynote speakers to open and close the conference\, we will host 
 two open roundtable discussions.\nFor the final day\, we would like to hos
 t a second roundtable—this time highlighting the rising stars of open sc
 ience. We would love to hear their personal stories and perspectives\, and
  at one point\, we plan to open the conversation to all SIPS attendees. We
  are confident that this discussion will provide fresh ideas and inspirati
 on that will carry into the SIPS sessions.
DTSTAMP:20260511T114601Z
LOCATION:The groundfloor
SUMMARY:The past\, present\, and future of scientific reform II - Lisa Spit
 zer\, Ekaterina Pronizius\, Alexandra Sarafoglou\, Agata Bochynska\, Jeffr
 ey Lees\, Marton Kovacs
URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2025-budapest/talk/BQYAPH/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR