BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//pretalx//pretalx.com//sips2025-budapest//speaker//GG9SNM
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:CET
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20001029T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
TZNAME:CET
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20000326T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:CEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-sips2025-budapest-JEYUDT@pretalx.com
DTSTART;TZID=CET:20250626T093000
DTEND;TZID=CET:20250626T094000
DESCRIPTION:Because many strong theories make clear predictions\, in princi
 ple there may be no advantage to registering such a theory’s predictions
  in advance of data collection (Szollosi & Donkin\, 2021). Some researcher
 s have therefore argued that preregistration is not worthwhile (Szollosi e
 t al.\, 2020).  Yet psychologists have not prioritized the development of 
 strong theories\, or even the use of existing ones.  Can we do something a
 bout this? I will argue that preregistration is\, ironically\, an importan
 t part of the answer. Strong theories are underappreciated in part because
  of the scarcity of both the skills and the time required to determine tha
 t a theory is strong and makes clear predictions. But because everyone rec
 ognizes the value of correct predictions\, preregistration can help strong
  theories rise to the top. However\, additional practices such as head-to-
 head comparisons of competing theories (Dutilh et al.\, 2018) may also be 
 necessary.
DTSTAMP:20260515T222234Z
LOCATION:Second floor 214
SUMMARY:LT23: Even those with strong theories should preregister their stud
 ies - Alex Holcombe
URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2025-budapest/talk/JEYUDT/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-sips2025-budapest-XNXUY8@pretalx.com
DTSTART;TZID=CET:20250627T110000
DTEND;TZID=CET:20250627T123000
DESCRIPTION:Some publishers perpetuate practices that conflict with the int
 erests of scholars. High publication-related fees are one example. An emph
 asis on crude metrics such as impact factor rather than quality evaluation
  of journal practices is another. We will describe initiatives that provid
 e alternatives and work on actions to support these. Peer Community Ins pe
 rform all the intellectual work of a journal in a way that is free for aut
 hors and readers\; relevant communities including PCI Registered Reports a
 nd PCI Psychology. In the metascience area\, MetaROR.org provides peer rev
 iews of preprints (which can optionally be submitted to journals). The Fre
 e Journal Network curates scholar-controlled diamond OA (free to publish i
 n and free to read) journals\, provides relevant advice\, and can support 
 editors interested in “flipping” to this model. In this hackathon\, we
  will develop strategies to facilitate the movement of psychologists and p
 sychology journals towards these publication practices.
DTSTAMP:20260515T222234Z
LOCATION:Second floor 213
SUMMARY:HC13: Taking psychology back: Supporting new publishing initiatives
  - Alex Holcombe
URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2025-budapest/talk/XNXUY8/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR