BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//pretalx//pretalx.com//sips2025-budapest//speaker//Q3RZVL
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:CET
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20001029T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
TZNAME:CET
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20000326T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:CEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-sips2025-budapest-JNVJNT@pretalx.com
DTSTART;TZID=CET:20250626T101400
DTEND;TZID=CET:20250626T102200
DESCRIPTION:Concerns about the construct validity of psychological measurem
 ents are increasing. In this lightening talk\, I propose a distinction bet
 ween the validity potential of psychological measurement procedures (e.g.\
 , personality tests) and the realised validity of the scores they produce 
 in specific instance (e.g.\, personality test scores collected in a study)
  and describe how this distinction can facilitate better construct validat
 ion practices and encourage more frequent validity evidence reporting.
DTSTAMP:20260512T125418Z
LOCATION:Second floor 213
SUMMARY:LT28: Validity potential versus realised validity - Wendy Higgins
URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2025-budapest/talk/JNVJNT/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-sips2025-budapest-PHNNMN@pretalx.com
DTSTART;TZID=CET:20250626T110000
DTEND;TZID=CET:20250626T123000
DESCRIPTION:Calls to improve the construct validity of psychological measur
 ements are increasing. However\, there is less information available about
  how to improve\, or even evaluate\, construct validity. One potential bar
 rier to developing clear construct validation guidelines is the undifferen
 tiated inclusion of measurement and non-measurement (e.g.\, prediction\, d
 iagnosis) uses of test scores under the umbrella of construct validity. Th
 is can be problematic because the characteristics that make a test a good 
 measure of a construct can differ from the characteristics that make a tes
 t good for other uses like prediction or diagnosis. In this hackathon\, we
  will develop a framework for evaluating psychological tests that distingu
 ishes between key test uses and summarises the most relevant sources of va
 lidity evidence based on each test’s type and use.
DTSTAMP:20260512T125418Z
LOCATION:Underground\, p08
SUMMARY:HC10: Developing a framework for assessing the quality of psycholog
 ical tests - Wendy Higgins
URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2025-budapest/talk/PHNNMN/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR