BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//pretalx//pretalx.com//sips2025-budapest//talk//ULENXX
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:CET
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20001029T040000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
TZNAME:CET
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20000326T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:CEST
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-sips2025-budapest-ULENXX@pretalx.com
DTSTART;TZID=CET:20250625T140000
DTEND;TZID=CET:20250625T140700
DESCRIPTION:Numerous studies confirm that researchers frequently misinterpr
 et key statistics in published articles. A particularly prevalent issue id
 entified previously is the tendency of researchers to misinterpret nonsign
 ificance as representing no true effect. Accordingly\, the present study a
 ims to re-investigate this issue – to clarify the prevalence of nonsigni
 ficance misinterpretations in published psychology articles and it's chang
 es over time. To achieve this\, we looked at nonsignificance statements in
  the discussion sections of 599 articles across three time points (2009\, 
 2015\, 2021) from ten psychology journals of varying impact factors. We th
 en coded each statement as correctly or incorrectly interpreting nonsignif
 icance. Our results reveal a higher prevalence of these misinterpretations
  compared to prior studies (81% incorrect). Based on these findings\, we u
 rge researchers to reconsider how they report and interpret their results\
 , with a focus on improving accuracy and transparency in the interpretatio
 n of statistically nonsignificant results.
DTSTAMP:20260516T144759Z
LOCATION:Second floor 214
SUMMARY:LT8: p > .05 = No Effect?! – Nonsignificance Misinterpreted as an
  Effect’s Absence in Psychology: Prevalence and Temporal Analyses - Raph
 ael Merz
URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2025-budapest/talk/ULENXX/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR