BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//pretalx//pretalx.com//sips2026-dc//speaker//BXUC9E
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:EST
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20001029T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10;UNTIL=20061029T070000Z
TZNAME:EST
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20071104T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:EST
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20000402T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4;UNTIL=20060402T080000Z
TZNAME:EDT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20070311T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:EDT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-sips2026-dc-JYU7RR@pretalx.com
DTSTART;TZID=EST:20260609T141000
DTEND;TZID=EST:20260609T141500
DESCRIPTION:Psychological science relies heavily on scale scores for diagno
 sis\, prediction\, and evaluating intervention effectiveness. Yet scale sc
 ores often aggregate items that reflect multiple\, and sometimes weakly re
 lated\, constructs. Drawing on validation work with the Adolescent Attachm
 ent Anxiety and Avoidance Inventory (AAAAI)\, this talk examines what is g
 ained and lost when item-level information is reduced to a scale score. Sc
 ale scores are contrasted with the shared variance of underlying latent fa
 ctor structure\, illustrating how theoretically distinct dimensions can be
  “smushed” into one number. At the same time\, different populations (
 such as clinical and non-clinical) distributions overlap\, such that a pro
 posed cutoff value trades misclassification between groups. This multi-dat
 aset analysis invites closer scrutiny of routine scale score practices by 
 using a concrete example to show how assumptions involving latent homogene
 ity and cutoff values are embedded in a single scale score.
DTSTAMP:20260524T183940Z
LOCATION:AUDITORIUM
SUMMARY:Scale Scores as Summary Statistics: An Example of What Gets Assumed
  Along the Way - Jason Payne
URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2026-dc/talk/JYU7RR/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-sips2026-dc-GJQ339@pretalx.com
DTSTART;TZID=EST:20260609T153000
DTEND;TZID=EST:20260609T170000
DESCRIPTION:This unconference extends the Courage and Cowardice series by e
 xamining a complementary tension in psychological science: the projection 
 of individual moral or political commitments into professional contexts. S
 cientific work necessarily involves value-laden judgements\, yet not all v
 alues are equally appropriate to impose as professional norms. Some moral 
 constraints\, such as minimizing harm in research with children\, are wide
 ly shared and foundational. Others reflect personal\, cultural\, or politi
 cal preferences that are difficult to justify as scientific obligations. B
 etween these extremes lies a broad and contested space in which researcher
 s must decide when moral positions should guide scientific practice\, disc
 ourse\, or institutional expectations. The aim is not to establish shared 
 rules or resolve disagreement\, but to provide space for individual reflec
 tion on when\, which\, and whether individual moral decisions or political
  positions should be brought into academia.
DTSTAMP:20260524T183940Z
LOCATION:HA Room 2416
SUMMARY:Courage and Cowardice in Academia: Politics\, Judgement\, and Where
  Authority Ends - Jason Payne
URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2026-dc/talk/GJQ339/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR