BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//pretalx//pretalx.com//sips2026-dc//speaker//Q3RZVL
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:EST
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20001029T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10;UNTIL=20061029T070000Z
TZNAME:EST
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20071104T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:EST
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20000402T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4;UNTIL=20060402T080000Z
TZNAME:EDT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20070311T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:EDT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-sips2026-dc-S8DLDG@pretalx.com
DTSTART;TZID=EST:20260609T143500
DTEND;TZID=EST:20260609T144000
DESCRIPTION:Publication in a peer-reviewed journal is often taken as a reli
 able indicator of credible research. We argue that this view places unreal
 istic expectations on journal-based peer review. Given practical constrain
 ts on time and expertise\, it is not feasible for journal-based peer revie
 w to consistently provide thorough vetting of all vital aspects of researc
 h credibility prior to publication. With greater transparency\, however\, 
 it could serve as an effective initial quality filter\, identifying resear
 ch that merits closer scrutiny through post-publication peer review.
DTSTAMP:20260524T183855Z
LOCATION:AUDITORIUM
SUMMARY:Putting Journal-based Peer Review in its Place - Wendy Higgins
URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2026-dc/talk/S8DLDG/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:pretalx-sips2026-dc-YSQYJN@pretalx.com
DTSTART;TZID=EST:20260610T110000
DTEND;TZID=EST:20260610T123000
DESCRIPTION:In psychological research\, the validity of measurements is oft
 en taken for granted. This is a serious problem because poorly validated m
 easurements mean weak scientific inferences. Let’s do something about it
 . Come join the Measurement Critic’s Challenge! \n\nWhat is the Measurem
 ent Critic’s Challenge? It’s a call to researchers to stress test psyc
 hological measurement procedures by actively searching for threats to thei
 r validity potential\, that is\, their capacity to produce valid measureme
 nts. The more stress tests a measurement procedure passes\, the more confi
 dent we can be in its output. In this unconference\, we will discuss commo
 n threats to measurement validity and have a go at spotting two types of v
 alidity threats: confounds and conceptual flaws.
DTSTAMP:20260524T183855Z
LOCATION:AUDITORIUM
SUMMARY:Measurement Critic’s Challenge - Wendy Higgins
URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2026-dc/talk/YSQYJN/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR