BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//pretalx//pretalx.com//sips2026-online//speaker//HLBMVD BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:EST BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20001029T030000 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10;UNTIL=20061029T070000Z TZNAME:EST TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 END:STANDARD BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20071104T030000 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 TZNAME:EST TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:20000402T030000 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=4;UNTIL=20060402T080000Z TZNAME:EDT TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:20070311T030000 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3 TZNAME:EDT TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:pretalx-sips2026-online-TMLTDD@pretalx.com DTSTART;TZID=EST:20260507T133500 DTEND;TZID=EST:20260507T134000 DESCRIPTION:Psychology's replicability crisis reflects methodological failu res andt fundamental fragmentation rooted in the discipline's history. Unl ike physics or biology\, psychology never unified its three incompatible f oundational programs maintaining isolated research communities throughout 150 years. Successive theoretical schisms from behaviorism-cognitivism con flicts to neuroscientific reductionism during the Decade of the Brain deep ened this fragmentation\, creating conditions where weak theories\, diverg ent methodological standards\, and insufficient cross-disciplinary dialogu e enabled questionable practices to proliferate. Large-scale replication a ttempts confirmed the consequences as only 36% of findings reproduced. We distinguish fragmentation from legitimate theoretical pluralism and propos e programmatic solutions based on interdisciplinary testing through multi -method scrutiny\, mathematical formalization constraining predictions\, a nd open science infrastructure enabling collaborative evaluation. These st rategies preserve necessary diversity while building integrative bridges b etween subdisciplines\, transforming psychology into a cumulative science where theory guides replication interpretation and predicts boundary condi tions.\nKeywords: replicability crisis\, replication\, reproducibility\, s cientific fragmentation\, psychological science DTSTAMP:20260617T094436Z LOCATION:Track 1 SUMMARY:oLT15: Fragmentation as a drive toward a replicability crisis - Lui z Henrique Santana URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2026-online/talk/TMLTDD/ END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:pretalx-sips2026-online-3JTJ9D@pretalx.com DTSTART;TZID=EST:20260507T134000 DTEND;TZID=EST:20260507T134500 DESCRIPTION:We analyze Brazilian psychology's historical constitution under dual Anglo-American and Continental European influences\, arguing their r eception produced incomplete scientific implementation characterized by ep istemological dependency\, institutional fragmentation\, and absence of in tegrated national scientific programs. Anglo-American traditions primarily influenced educational and organizational fields\, while Continental trad itions dominated clinical training and critical orientations. Examining th e period from late-nineteenth-century academic introduction through the mi d-1990s demonstrates how uncritical importation produced dual epistemologi cal colonization without national programmatic synthesis. The anti-asylum movement achieved ethical-political gains without robust methodological co nsolidation. Paradoxically\, contemporary anticolonial movements\, coincid ing with graduate program expansion\, distanced Brazilian psychology from international standards\, deepening methodological gaps and compromising a dvanced training. Despite possessing the Americas' largest psychologist co ntingent\, Brazilian psychology faces paradoxes such as minimal global sci entific insertion\, curricular fragmentation\, low remuneration\, and high professional precarity\, requiring integrated national programs articulat ing methodological rigor\, social responsibility\, and strategic internati onal engagement. DTSTAMP:20260617T094436Z LOCATION:Track 1 SUMMARY:oLT16: Anglo-American School and Continental School: Two Influences on the Constitution of Brazilian Psychology - Luiz Henrique Santana URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2026-online/talk/3JTJ9D/ END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:pretalx-sips2026-online-LNMKDN@pretalx.com DTSTART;TZID=EST:20260507T134500 DTEND;TZID=EST:20260507T135000 DESCRIPTION:The early decades of the 21st century have witnessed an increas ingly fragmented landscape within naturalistic psychology\, characterized by divergent epistemological commitments and methodological practices acro ss subdisciplines. This theoretical analysis examines how three prominent psychological traditions—psychometrics\, evolutionary psychology\, and b ehavior analysis—differentially operationalize the foundational scientif ic concepts of premises\, evidence\, and proof. Each tradition is shown to embody distinct assumptions about what constitutes valid scientific inqui ry\, what counts as acceptable empirical support\, and what standards must be met for knowledge claims to be accepted as provisionally true. Despite this fragmentation\, all three traditions maintain commitment to naturali sm\, empiricism\, and the self-correcting character of scientific knowledg e accumulation. The analysis reveals both the productive diversity and pro blematic incommensurability that characterize contemporary psychological s cience\, offering implications for interdisciplinary integration\, trainin g practices\, and the future coherence of the field. DTSTAMP:20260617T094436Z LOCATION:Track 1 SUMMARY:oLT17: Premises\, Evidence\, and Proof in the Fragmented Field of N aturalistic Psychology - Luiz Henrique Santana URL:https://pretalx.com/sips2026-online/talk/LNMKDN/ END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR