SIPS 2026 Online

Michael Höfler

I am seeking means to make psychological research more falsifiable and transparent in its assumptions, especially for causal questions.


Your affiliation:

Clinical Psychology and Behavioural Neuroscience, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Chemnitzer Straße 46, 01187 Dresden, Germany.

Social Media Handles:

tontrug.bsky.social


Session

05-06
15:30
60min
oUC3: When to leave open versus disclose flexibilities in the research process
Michael Höfler

Disclosing flexibilities in the research process (wording of a hypothesis, data collection, processing and analysis) holds researchers accountable for their predictions and fosters rigour in hypothesis testing. Conversely, if flexibilities are left open, other researchers can specify them differently based on different substantive assumptions. To enable rigorous hypothesis testing by others, preregistration of secondary data analysis has been suggested. However, this does not guarantee the desired rigour.

This unconference shall discuss and initiate the implementation of a new approach. The approach allows and obliges researchers to specify the flexibilities before data collection. This may give rise to extensions in study design (e.g. the addition of a questionnaire) and produce different test results, which depend on these specifications and their justifications. Exploratory research naturally arises from what is left over from these discussions, concerning gaps and research beyond the strict limits of confirmatory research.

Unconference
Track 1