Sota Maruono
Sota Maruono is a high school teacher at Tokiwa University High School, specializing in
Assyriology and history education. He received his B.A. in Humanities from the University of Tsukuba. His research focuses on bridging historical scholarship and pedagogy, with a particular interest in how the methodologies of Assyriology can inform innovative practices in history education. He has published on topics such as the application of social network analysis to cuneiform sources and the design of collaborative learning models in the classroom. In addition to his teaching, Maruono actively engages in public history initiatives that promote open, citizen-collaborative approaches to the study of the ancient world. He has presented his work at numerous lectures and conferences, aiming to connect academic
research with wider audiences and to foster dialogue between ancient history, digital methods,
and contemporary educational practices. https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0240-2298
Tokiwa University High School
Sessions
This paper explores how world history can be written and taught at a time marked by both deep global interconnection and the political retreat of globalization. Focusing on Japan, it examines the tension between globally oriented educational reforms and nationally bounded historical narratives through the framework of “Open Studies on the Ancient Mediterranean World History.”
Since 2022, Japan has introduced new high school subjects—“Modern and Contemporary History,” “Advanced World History,” and “Advanced Japanese History”—which emphasize inquiry-based learning, historical thinking, and citizenship education. These reforms align with global educational models promoted by organizations such as the OECD and the International Baccalaureate. However, classroom practice often continues to assume a cohesive national “we,” leaving insufficiently examined the questions of who defines this “we” and who is constructed as “others.”
The paper argues that “Open Studies on the Ancient Mediterranean World History” provides a productive alternative by rethinking identity beyond the modern nation-state. It highlights Phoenician identity as mobile, relational, and network-based rather than territorially fixed. The Phoenicians illustrate a historical world structured by trade, migration, and cultural exchange without a single dominant political center—offering a valuable precedent for today’s interconnected yet fragmented world.
Through inquiry-based classroom practices that bridge ancient and modern history, students compare constructions of “we” in modern Japanese history with identity formation in the ancient Mediterranean. By engaging with primary sources and competing narratives, they critically examine how historical boundaries are formed, whose voices define the past, and which perspectives are marginalized.
The paper concludes that world history education in a post-globalization era requires models of connection that transcend national exceptionalism. Japan’s cross-temporal and cross-regional approach to the ancient Mediterranean contributes meaningfully to reimagining the global past.
World history education has long been shaped by the assumption that globalization represents an inevitable and progressive historical process. Drawing on educational contexts in Korea and Japan, this paper reconsiders how the global past can be taught in a contemporary world marked by strengthened border controls, resurgent nationalism, and growing skepticism toward globalization.
This paper argues that the Neo-Assyrian Empire (934-609BCE) offers an effective pedagogical case for teaching world history in a “post-globalization” context. While Assyria is often associated with militarism, forced deportations, and centralized imperial rule, cuneiform archival materials from Assur and other urban centers reveal an imperial system sustained by long-distance trade, professional mobility, and the integration of foreign families into the state economy. Mobility and connectivity in the Assyrian world were neither free nor universal, but carefully managed by imperial institutions, producing a form of imperial connectivity without globalization.
From a pedagogical perspective, the Assyrian case challenges teleological narratives that equate historical connectivity with modern globalization. By incorporating Assyrian evidence into secondary and undergraduate world history courses, educators can encourage students to ask critical questions about borders, migration, and inequality: who was allowed to move, trade, and communicate across imperial space, and under what conditions? The paper concludes by outlining concrete classroom strategies—such as source-based inquiry and comparative discussion—that use pre-modern imperial history to help students critically engage with contemporary tensions between global interdependence and political closure.