Researcher diversity remains a significant challenge in academia, with minority scholars in both the Global North and Global South continuing to be underrepresented. The exclusion of women and other marginalised groups within the Global South is further overlooked. Existing diversity metrics, such as using institutional affiliation as a proxy, fail to capture these disparities, while API-based predictive tools like Genderize, Ageify, and Nationalize can misclassify authors' gender or nationality, reinforcing existing biases. In this unconference, we will examine the limitations of current diversity measurement tools and methods. Are there alternative, more nuanced approaches for measuring researcher diversity in psychology? How can we develop metrics that truly reflect the diversity of the global research community without oversimplifying representation? By unpacking these questions, we aim to expand the conversation on authorship diversity and reimagine diversity data in ways that better support the academic pipeline for all scholars.